Re: [NTG-context] \getbuffer without extra whitespace?

Gerben Wierda via ntg-context schrieb am 29.05.2023 um 16:19: If I do something like: \startbuffer[version]20230529a\stopbuffer Version: \getbuffer[version]-en I get whitespace between the content of the buffer and “-en” What is the proper LMTX way to do this? You need the \inlinebuffer

[NTG-context] \getbuffer without extra whitespace?

If I do something like: \startbuffer[version]20230529a\stopbuffer Version: \getbuffer[version]-en I get whitespace between the content of the buffer and “-en” What is the proper LMTX way to do this? Gerben Wierda (LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/gerbenwierda>) R Enterprise Archit

Re: [NTG-context] To \getbuffer or to \input: which one is it better?

> On 11 Feb 2018, at 14:17, Aditya Mahajan wrote: > > On Sun, 11 Feb 2018, Hans Hagen wrote: > […] > > I prefer starting with XML and converting it to a lua table using helper > functions. The advantage of XML is that you can verify the data using an RNC > schema. Hi

Re: [NTG-context] To \getbuffer or to \input: which one is it better?

On 2/11/2018 2:17 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote: On Sun, 11 Feb 2018, Hans Hagen wrote: Think different ... see end. \startluacode     document.speakerdata = {     {     speakername = "Gauss",     title   = "Remarks on Number Theory",     time    = "8am",   

Re: [NTG-context] To \getbuffer or to \input: which one is it better?

On Sun, 11 Feb 2018, Hans Hagen wrote: Think different ... see end. \startluacode document.speakerdata = { { speakername = "Gauss", title = "Remarks on Number Theory", time= "8am", room= "B", day

Re: [NTG-context] To \getbuffer or to \input: which one is it better?

\EQ \getvariable{talk}{day}, at \getvariable{talk}{time} \NC\NR \HL \stoptabulate } } \starttext \starttitle[title={Monday talks}] \setvariable{talk}{set}{\talksofday{Monday}} \getbuffer[talkdata] \stoptitle \page \starttitle[title={Tuesday

[NTG-context] To \getbuffer or to \input: which one is it better?

the \getbuffer command for each of the different uses in my global document. For now, unfortunately, I cannot come up with a minimal example because the question I am asking is about a real situation where nothing is minimal. That is why I am asking a general abstract question to understand the general

Re: [NTG-context] Change behavior for \getbuffer

On 3/28/2015 1:50 AM, Rik Kabel wrote: The behavior of \getbuffer has changed with the new beta. With the following sample code, one line of text is produced with the 2015-03-25 beta. Two lines of text are produced with the more recent betas. \startbuffer A \stopbuffer

Re: [NTG-context] Change behavior for \getbuffer

On Fri, 27 Mar 2015 20:50:52 -0400 Rik Kabel cont...@rik.users.panix.com wrote: The behavior of \getbuffer has changed with the new beta. With the following sample code, one line of text is produced with the 2015-03-25 beta. Two lines of text are produced with the more recent betas

[NTG-context] Change behavior for \getbuffer

The behavior of \getbuffer has changed with the new beta. With the following sample code, one line of text is produced with the 2015-03-25 beta. Two lines of text are produced with the more recent betas. \startbuffer A \stopbuffer \starttext A \getbuffer \stoptext -- rik

[NTG-context] xtable (\getbuffer vs. \processxtablebuffer)

\stopxrow \stopxtable \stopbuffer \getbuffer[my:xtable]\blank \processxtablebuffer[my:xtable] \stoptext Regards Andreas ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki

Re: [NTG-context] xtable (\getbuffer vs. \processxtablebuffer)

\stopxcell \startxcell gamma \stopxcell \stopxrow \stopxtable \stopbuffer \getbuffer[my:xtable]\blank \processxtablebuffer[my:xtable] \stoptext fixed in next beta but no nesting of xtables ... too much coding and it would nil the advantage (if there is any) anyway Hans

Re: [NTG-context] xtable (\getbuffer vs. \processxtablebuffer)

alpha \stopxcell \startxcell beta \stopxcell \startxcell gamma \stopxcell \stopxrow \stopxtable \stopbuffer \getbuffer[my:xtable]\blank \processxtablebuffer[my:xtable] \stoptext fixed in next beta but no nesting of xtables ... too much coding and it would nil

Re: [NTG-context] expansion problem with \getbuffer again (mkiv)

\leavevmode l.20 \setlayer[FOO]{\getbuffer[FOO]} ? ! Emergency stop. inserted text \endgroup to be read again \vskip \stopblankhandling ...ional \someblankdone \vskip \blankskip \fi

Re: [NTG-context] expansion problem with \getbuffer again (mkiv)

\leavevmode l.20 \setlayer[FOO]{\getbuffer[FOO]} ? ! Emergency stop. inserted text \endgroup to be read again \vskip \stopblankhandling ...ional \someblankdone \vskip

[NTG-context] expansion problem with \getbuffer again (mkiv)

\setlayer[FOO]{\getbuffer[FOO]} ? ! Emergency stop. inserted text \endgroup to be read again \vskip \stopblankhandling ...ional \someblankdone \vskip \blankskip \fi \endgroup l.3

[NTG-context] Correction for \getbuffer

Hi Hans, The definition for \getBUFFER need to be changed because it use the undefined command \dodoprocessTEXbuffer. \def\dodefinebuffer[#1][#2]% {\iffirstargument % else problems \doglobal\increment\nofdefinedbuffers \letvalue{\??bu#1\c!number }\nofdefinedbuffers \letvalue

Re: [NTG-context] Correction for \getbuffer

Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Hi Hans, The definition for \getBUFFER need to be changed because it use the undefined command \dodoprocessTEXbuffer. \def\dodefinebuffer[#1][#2]% {\iffirstargument % else problems \doglobal\increment\nofdefinedbuffers \letvalue{\??bu#1\c!number

[NTG-context] getbuffer now fails

I had this code working (it was in an article I submitted for NTG-MAPS a while ago, july 2007). Now this same code gives an error on getbuffer. What happened to getbuffer? Is it possible a \fi has disappeared in the getbuffer code between now and last july? Is there a quick patch because now

Re: [NTG-context] getbuffer now fails

I submitted for NTG-MAPS a while ago, july 2007). Now this same code gives an error on getbuffer. What happened to getbuffer? Is it possible a \fi has disappeared in the getbuffer code between now and last july? Is there a quick patch because now I get stuck on work that has

Re: [NTG-context] framed getbuffer

On Thu, 22 Mar 2007, Taco Hoekwater wrote: Wolfgang Werners-Lucchini wrote: Hallo! The following simple example doesn't compile (ConTeXt ver. 2007.01.02 and Live ConTeXt). What am I doing wrong? Diagnostics: The problem is not caused by the \framed, but by the (lack of) parsing done

Re: [NTG-context] framed getbuffer

This is a serious bug. Even a simple example fails with the same error. \starttext \framed{ \startformula x^2 = x\cdot x \stopformula} \stoptext A quick workaround is to use frametext instead of framed, but I am pretty sure that the above example used to work at some stage. hmm, I can

Re: [NTG-context] framed getbuffer

\startbuffer \startformula x^2 = x\cdot x \stopformula \stopbuffer \framed[width=6cm,height=4cm]{\getbuffer} Wolfgang ___ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context

Re: [NTG-context] framed getbuffer

On Thu, 22 Mar 2007, Taco Hoekwater wrote: Diagnostics: The problem is not caused by the \framed, but by the (lack of) parsing done by the buffering routines. Because the \startformula is not expanded, TeX does not realise you are in math mode, so it objects to the ^ character.

Re: [NTG-context] framed getbuffer

On Wed, 11 Apr 2007, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: 2007/4/11, Aditya Mahajan [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Thu, 22 Mar 2007, Taco Hoekwater wrote: Wolfgang Werners-Lucchini wrote: Hallo! The following simple example doesn't compile (ConTeXt ver. 2007.01.02 and Live ConTeXt). What am I

Re: [NTG-context] framed getbuffer

Wolfgang Werners-Lucchini wrote: Hallo! The following simple example doesn't compile (ConTeXt ver. 2007.01.02 and Live ConTeXt). What am I doing wrong? Diagnostics: The problem is not caused by the \framed, but by the (lack of) parsing done by the buffering routines. Because the

[NTG-context] framed getbuffer

Hallo! The following simple example doesn't compile (ConTeXt ver. 2007.01.02 and Live ConTeXt). What am I doing wrong? \starttext \startbuffer \startformula x^2 = x\cdot x \stopformula \stopbuffer \framed{\getbuffer} \stoptext Wolfgang ___ ntg

[NTG-context] \getbuffer question

All, If you do something like: \startbuffer \setupYadaYada . . . . \stopbuffer Then you do: \getbuffer will the setup be in a group, and only pertain to the stuff set with \getbuffer? ___ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http

Re: [NTG-context] \getbuffer question

David Arnold wrote: Then you do: \getbuffer will the setup be in a group, and only pertain to the stuff set with \getbuffer? No, normally they will live on (buffers often contain definitions). But you can use \setupbuffer[before=\begingroup,after=\endgroup] Cheers, taco

[NTG-context] howto \getbuffer inside of \startTEX ... \stopTEX

Hi all, I have a following code: -- \startbuffer \bTABLE \bTR \bTH title1 \eTH \bTH title2 \eTH \eTR \bTR \bTD data1 \eTD \bTD data2 \eTD \eTR \eTABLE \stopbuffer \startTEX \getbuffer \stopTEX \getbuffer

Re: [NTG-context] howto \getbuffer inside of \startTEX ... \stopTEX

VnPenguin wrote: Hi all, I have a following code: -- \startbuffer \bTABLE \bTR \bTH title1 \eTH \bTH title2 \eTH \eTR \bTR \bTD data1 \eTD \bTD data2 \eTD \eTR \eTABLE \stopbuffer \startTEX \getbuffer \stopTEX \getbuffer